Skip to content

Is it Microsoft?

This exchange happened today between me and a client while presenting the final release of an application:

Me: So, let’s now log in to the system…
Client: Actually, I wanted to ask about something. Is this written using Microsoft technologies?
Me: No, it’s written on a different stack.
Client: Shoot!
Me: Why?
Client: What technology is it written with?
Me: It’s written in Ruby, connects to MySQL and runs on Linux. Why?
Client: Shoot! Shoot! Shoot!
Me: Well. It was laid out clearly in my proposal that we’re going to use that particular stack.
Client: Is it easy to migrate the application to Microsoft technology. You know: IIS, .Net, etc…
Me: Not unless we re-wrote the whole thing. why?
Client: A friend told me that I could get a Microsoft funding for my application if it was written in Microsoft technologies.

That’s after 2 weeks of wireframes and initial design, 5 weeks of implementation, a mid-way release presented to the client in person.

What a way to ruin a good application release.

PS: I have a bad feeling about this, the client hasn’t paid (yet) for the implementation.

Posted in Professional, Ruby.

One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. oldmoe says

    That’s seven weeks in toto. Almost two months Tamer! and you still didn’t get paid a penny? Anyways, AFAIK this (Microzeft funding) only works if the guy is a non-profit which I doubt. So tell him to relax. I may be wrong though.

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.