<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Human Forms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamersalama.com/2008/10/30/human-forms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamersalama.com/2008/10/30/human-forms/</link>
	<description>of Tamer Salama</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:54:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenton</title>
		<link>http://tamersalama.com/2008/10/30/human-forms/comment-page-1/#comment-90301</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamersalama.com/?p=802#comment-90301</guid>
		<description>This is a tough one to decide on, I agree with Adam that it all tends to blend together and it takes more time to read through to see what it is their asking. Whereas a &#039;typical&#039; form, in a list, is easier to get through. However, for some things, this way of being more readable makes it more comfortable and not just a faceless database. I could see this being used for a &quot;touchy-feely&quot; type website, or for those who are unfamiliar with web forms (ex: the elderly) ... Mind you, as a code-monkey I&#039;m so used to forms now that I expect them to be point-form ... It&#039;s a very cool idea, nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a tough one to decide on, I agree with Adam that it all tends to blend together and it takes more time to read through to see what it is their asking. Whereas a &#8216;typical&#8217; form, in a list, is easier to get through. However, for some things, this way of being more readable makes it more comfortable and not just a faceless database. I could see this being used for a &#8220;touchy-feely&#8221; type website, or for those who are unfamiliar with web forms (ex: the elderly) &#8230; Mind you, as a code-monkey I&#8217;m so used to forms now that I expect them to be point-form &#8230; It&#8217;s a very cool idea, nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
